Humanitarian and Human Rights Agenda for North Korea


Following the conference on humanitarian and human rights agenda of the Brookings-SAIS Project on Internal Displacement and Refugees International in March 2004, Joel Charny, Vice President for Policy, Refugees International and Roberta Cohen, Brookings Nonresident Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, authored the following suggested agenda for human rights and humanitarian aid in the DPRK. These are hotly contested points, and CanKor would be pleased to hear where you stand on these issues. Please send us your comments.

A Suggested Humanitarian and Human Rights Agenda for North Korea by Joel Charny and Roberta Cohen, 20 July 2004

HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

  • Because humanitarian aid “should know no politics,” donors should de-link extension of food aid and medicines from political and strategic objectives but make it conditional on progress toward international humanitarian standards.
  • The standards should include: unimpeded access to all parts of North Korea and to all vulnerable populations irrespective of political categorization; and monitoring by independent relief organizations to verify that the aid is reaching those for whom it is intended and distributed in accordance with humanitarian principles.
  • Progress indicators would be: access to additional counties; ability to do unannounced monitoring visits; ability to hire independent interpreters or have Korean speakers on staff; provision of verifiable distribution plans and lists.
  • Aid to improve agriculture (eg, machinery, fertilizer, technical assistance) should be considered after progress on more equitable distribution of food.

INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EXODUS

  • To mitigate famine, international humanitarian organizations and donors should advocate for people to be allowed to forage for food and seek employment within the country without being subject to arrest or harassment.
  • International aid agencies should seek information on persons internally displaced in the country with a view to providing international assistance to them.
  • The international community should recognize that the border between North Korea and China is a lifeline for North Koreans during times of severe food shortages and insist that this border remain open.
  • Because North Koreans are under constant threat of arrest and deportation in China, and when returned to North Korea may be placed in labor training centers and otherwise punished, international advocacy should focus on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) being given unimpeded access to this population.
  • UNHCR should then determine who qualifies as a refugee amongst this population and accord a special “humanitarian status” to those who do not qualify in order to protect them from arbitrary arrest and deportation.
  • In cooperation with UNHCR, the United States should seek to establish an orderly process for North Korean refugees to be resettled.

HUMAN RIGHTS

  • A human rights and humanitarian dialogue should be initiated with North Korea, both multilaterally and bilaterally, with benchmarks of progress identified for these dialogues.
  • At the multilateral level, in accordance with the resolutions of the UN Commission on Human Rights, a dialogue should be initiated between the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the government of North Korea, and OHCHR should offer technical assistance programs on human rights.
  • At the same time, human rights and humanitarian organizations should mobilize support for the monitoring of human rights conditions in North Korea, inclusive of the right to food, by the UN Commission on Human Rights and by UN human rights treaty bodies.
  • Governments and NGOs should explore bringing North Korea into the human dimension framework of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and developing a Helsinki process for North and South Korea.
  • Human rights and humanitarian issues should be introduced, at an appropriate point, into the negotiations with North Korea on security issues, guided by the precedent of the Helsinki Final Act in Europe.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: